Skip to content

New Jersey voters still divided on casino expansion​

Jefferson Mendoza
Written by Jefferson Mendoza

Findings from a recent Fairleigh Dickinson University survey show that half of New Jersey voters oppose expanding casino gambling beyond Atlantic City, while 44 per cent support it.  Interestingly enough, these figures mirror polling from 2014, suggesting public opinion has barely shifted over the past decade.​

Lawmakers reconsider racetrack casinos

Legislators are weighing whether to permit casinos at racetracks such as the Meadowlands and Monmouth Park. Both proposed venues are New Jersey’s premier horse racing venues. They are considered potential sites due to their size, history, and proximity to major metro areas.​

For one, Meadowlands is close to New York City, while Monmouth Park is near the Jersey Shore, a tourist-heavy region.​

Additionally, the proposal is viewed as a defensive strategy against new casinos opening in New York, which threaten to draw wagers and revenue away from New Jersey.​ New York recently approved three casinos in Queens and the Bronx. Although Manhattan proposals were rejected, the New York City metro area now boasts major gambling venues, heightening regional competition.​

Atlantic City’s exclusive role

Casino expansion in New Jersey has had a long legislative history. Voters first rejected statewide gambling in 1974. But two years later, casino gambling was legalised in Atlantic City to revive its struggling economy. Since then, the city has remained the state’s sole casino hub.​

However, every attempt to expand beyond Atlantic City has required a constitutional amendment, which has repeatedly failed due to strong voter opposition and fears of undermining the city’s economic base.​

Economic stakes

With nine casinos in Atlantic City, it has generated billions annually. It also employs thousands of people and contributes heavily to state programmes. In 2023 alone, they produced about $467 million in tax revenue, according to Stockton University.

In addition, the latest figures from New Jersey’s Division of Gaming Enforcement show that gaming-related taxes and fees exceeded $600 million in fiscal year 2026. 

Supporters of expansion argue that racetrack casinos could capture revenue currently flowing to New York and Pennsylvania, where legalised sports betting and online gambling have intensified competition. Opponents warn that expansion could dilute Atlantic City’s market and stall its recovery.​

(Source: New Jersey Office of the Attorney General)

Regional divide

Proponents emphasise accessibility. As one Long Beach resident told News 12, having a nearby option makes sense, especially since many residents already gamble through apps or travel to neighbouring states. Meanwhile, opponents of the proposal warn of social and economic downsides. A decade ago, opposition was even stronger: 77 per cent of voters rejected expansion outside Atlantic City, compared with just 23 per cent approving it.​

​Additionally, results from the polls unveil a geographic split. Voters in northern New Jersey showed stronger support for racetrack casinos, as they would benefit from them. But southern voters remain protective of Atlantic City’s monopoly.​

Atlantic City remains the hub

Despite ongoing discussions, Atlantic City remains the anchor of the state’s gambling industry. The city attracts millions of visitors annually, supports 23,000 jobs, and generates billions in economic activity. Casino revenues fund programmes for seniors and disabled residents, while local taxes and fees, ranging from parking charges to slot machine levies, bolster municipal and state budgets.​

Atlantic City also offers hotels, restaurants, entertainment venues, and conventions.

Subscribe HERE to SiGMA’s Top 10 News countdown and SiGMA’s weekly newsletter to stay up to date with all the latest iGaming News from the world’s iGaming authority, and benefit from subscriber-only offers. 

This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.