AGA and IGA push congress to restrict prediction markets
The American Gaming Association (AGA) and the Indian Gaming Association (IGA) have called on Congress to act against prediction market platforms offering contracts on sports-related events, arguing that the products function as unlicensed sports betting.
The groups claim federally regulated prediction markets are bypassing state gaming laws and tribal agreements by operating under the oversight of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) rather than traditional gambling regulators.
Following platforms like Kalshi’s expansion into sports-event contracts, which are said to now make up a significant portion of trading activity, the disagreement became more heated. Prediction market organisations now bypass the stringent state licensing procedures, fees, and compliance regulations that licensed sportsbooks and tribal operators contend they must deal with.
Joint letter to Congress
In a joint letter to Congress, IGA chairman David Z. Bean and AGA president and CEO William C. Miller Jr. expressed a concerted opposition to federally regulated prediction markets. They were worried that since the Supreme Court removed the federal ban on sports betting in 2018, state laws and tribal compacts that have rigorously regulated gaming could be circumvented by using event contracts to enable sports betting or casino-style gambling statewide. This is perceived by tribal nations as a danger to revenue-sharing agreements linked to wagering rights and sovereignty.
Both organisations brought up concerns about consumer protection, pointing out that whereas state authorities impose stringent regulations on advertising, responsible gaming, and integrity monitoring, prediction markets do not have the same protections. The letter emphasised concerns that federal regulation might upset decades of state and tribal autonomy over gaming and tip the scales in the sector.
Digital Asset Clarity Act
Despite its emphasis on cryptocurrencies and stablecoins, the Digital Asset Clarity Act has alarmed the gaming industry by extending the CFTC’s jurisdiction. Concerns that event contract regulation would be incorporated into more comprehensive cryptocurrency legislation were heightened by the Senate Banking Committee’s recent 15-9 decision to move the bill.
Since prediction markets might function nationwide without state licences or compacts, state and tribal officials worry that this could undermine their long-standing control over gambling laws. The issue is made more complicated by the connection between cryptocurrency and prediction markets, which forces legislators to weigh financial technology innovation against the possibility of weakening long-standing gaming regulations.
Prediction markets legal dispute
A really challenging topic is at the centre of the legal disputes between states and prediction market operators: are sports event contracts financial products or just a new kind of gambling? Operators contend that these products should be governed by federal commodity regulations, while state regulators are adamant that wagering on sporting events for financial gain is prohibited by gambling laws regardless of how it is marketed or packaged.
Either way, the decision made in that debate will have major ramifications. In the event that states win, operators will be in a similar situation to traditional bookmakers since they will have to apply for licences in every jurisdiction. The ability of states to control gambling within their borders may be significantly weakened if courts support prediction markets.
The topic has previously been resolved by nations including the UK, France, Australia, and New Zealand, which have categorised sports prediction markets as gambling that needs to be properly licensed. Prediction market proponents refute this similarity, claiming that event contracts have a legitimate function by producing valuable forecasting data. Instead of adopting the tightest interpretation, they contend that legislators and regulators should ultimately choose where financial innovation ends and gambling begins.
Tribal gaming concerns rise
Prediction markets are a contentious issue that affects tribal nations‘ finances and sovereignty equally. Tribal gambling occurs under agreements made with states that recognise tribal jurisdiction and provide revenue-sharing arrangements. Following widespread legalisation, sports betting became a notable expansion of these rights. However, prediction markets could get around those accords by offering federally regulated products without tribal participation, raising concerns that decades of hard-won authority could be compromised.
The IGA emphasises that gaming profits support housing, hospitals, schools, and other vital services in native communities. Because they perceived federal regulation of prediction markets as a danger to both sovereignty and economic survival, tribal officials joined commercial operators in rejecting it.
Political shift inside CFTC
Recent debates over prediction markets highlight two major shifts in US gambling policy. First, the CFTC’s position seems to be softening, with detractors cautioning that long-standing prohibitions on contracts for sporting events might no longer be upheld. This led to bipartisan initiatives to reinforce state and tribal jurisdiction, such the “Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act.” The Senate banned members and staff from using prediction platforms after lawmakers voiced worries about insider trading and manipulation.
Second, whether prediction markets have the potential to completely transform gambling is a more general topic. Opponents claim they operate like bookmakers under a different name, while supporters view them as cutting-edge forecasting tools. They may spread across the country and undermine state and tribal authority if they were granted federal protection. They might be compelled to follow the same licensing regulations as sportsbooks if they are restricted, which would maintain the status quo but stifle new ideas. With the distinction between trade and gambling becoming increasingly hazy, the result will influence the future of financial markets and sports betting.
The fuse is lit in Mexico City. SiGMA North America from 01–03 Sept 2026. 4,000 delegates. Three days of deals, insight, and startup sparks. Lead from the front and book your spot.
