ANJL challenges DataFolha over betting survey as Brazil debate on gambling and debt heats up
Brazil’s betting debate is back in the spotlight, with ANJL formally questioning DataFolha over an imminent survey that reportedly links betting to debt and the electoral debate. The press release sent to the media comes just days after ANJL president Plínio Lemos Jorge appeared at BiS SiGMA South America in São Paulo, keeping the association close to the centre of Brazil’s regulated gaming conversation.
“Betting operators are not questioning the role of DataFolha or any other research institute. What the sector is asking for is an impartial disclosure, without distortions and without equivalences that make no sense, such as betting with bank loans,” said Plínio Lemos Jorge, president of the association.
According to the association, the issue is not the existence of research, but how the subject is being handled. ANJL says the survey reportedly fails to distinguish between legal and illegal betting operators, which the group argues could lead to misleading conclusions about the industry and its impact on Brazilian consumers.
The association also objects to betting being grouped with traditional credit products such as mortgages, payroll loans and credit cards. In ANJL’s view, that comparison distorts the nature of betting as an entertainment service and risks creating an exaggerated link between gaming and household indebtedness.
The concern matters because Brazil’s market remains split between the regulated segment and a large illegal sector. ANJL argues that any serious survey should clearly separate licensed operators from clandestine sites, especially when discussing consumer behaviour, spending and the broader social debate around gambling.
The timing is also politically sensitive. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has recently renewed pressure on the betting sector, and SiGMA News previously covered that shift in Brazil: President Lula turns on betting sector. Against that backdrop, ANJL says any survey released without clear methodology could end up shaping public opinion in a way that overstates the role of legal betting while ignoring the scale of the black market.
What remains unclear is whether the DataFolha study will be released as a standalone piece of research or as part of a broader political and social polling cycle. Publicly available references indicate DataFolha has been active with recent electoral polling in April, but the full betting-focused survey has not yet been verified in published form.
That is why ANJL’s main demand is transparency. The association wants clarification on the technical criteria used, the wording of the questions and whether the survey makes proper distinctions between regulated and unregulated betting activity.
For now, the story is less about a published report than about the battle over how Brazil’s betting market is described. With the election cycle heating up and the industry under closer scrutiny than ever, the next DataFolha release could become another flashpoint in the country’s wider regulatory debate.
Stay in the loop and join the biggest iGaming Community in the world with SiGMA’s Top 10 news countdown. Subscribe HERE for weekly updates from the world’s iGaming authority and exclusive subscriber-only offers.
