New York casino expansion triggers New Jersey racino debate
New York City is moving ahead with three casino proposals, and the development has revived debate in New Jersey. Lawmakers are once again considering casinos outside Atlantic City, focusing on the Meadowlands and Monmouth Park racecourses. For years, expanding gaming beyond Atlantic City was seen as unlikely. Now, with New York preparing to open large casinos in its metropolitan area, officials in Trenton worry New Jersey could lose its northern gaming market.
On 1 December, the New York State Gaming Facility Location Board recommended three downstate casino proposals for licensing. These projects, located in Queens and the Bronx, mark a major move in the state’s gaming policy. If approved by the Gaming Commission, the casinos could open by mid‑2026, positioning the New York metropolitan area as a major centre for gaming in the United States.
Threat to New Jersey’s gambling industry
For decades, Atlantic City was the main centre for gaming on the East Coast. With New York now moving forward on casino projects, the competitive balance is shifting. The new casinos are expected to attract both tourists and local players who previously travelled to New Jersey. If New York’s plans succeed, the tri‑state region could see a new dynamic where New Jersey no longer dominates high‑end gambling outside Las Vegas.
New Jersey officials are most concerned about revenue. Each New Yorker who chooses to gamble locally means less tax income for New Jersey. Players from northern New Jersey, who make up a significant share of Atlantic City’s market, may prefer shorter trips to New York’s casinos. Atlantic City is still recovering from the pandemic downturn, and any decline in visitors could slow or reverse that progress.
Senator Joe Pennacchio’s push
State Senator Joe Pennacchio (R‑26) has argued for years that New Jersey is losing revenue by not expanding its casino operations. Pennacchio’s central point is that New Jersey is missing an opportunity by not using its racecourses for gaming. His proposal focuses on updating the state’s approach to gambling revenue. A Meadowlands racino, he argues, could generate hundreds of millions each year to support property tax relief, education, and pensions.
In a recent statement, he said, “New York is charging ahead with three new casinos while New Jersey sits on its hands and watches our gaming revenue drift across the river. It’s unacceptable. A Meadowlands racino would be an immediate economic engine for our state, yet leaders refuse to act. I’m renewing my call for racinos because New Jersey can’t afford to keep falling behind while our neighbors eat our lunch.”
Future of New Jersey gaming expansion
Located near Manhattan, the Meadowlands Racecourse is already a leading sports wagering venue. Adding slot machines and table games could expand its role in the region. Analysts suggest a Meadowlands casino might outperform some Atlantic City properties because of its proximity to the New York metropolitan area.
SCR130 is a constitutional amendment proposed in the New Jersey legislature. It would permit up to two casinos outside Atlantic City, specifically at the Meadowlands and Monmouth Park racecourses. This plan differs from the 2016 referendum, which voters rejected by 77 to 23 percent. Unlike that broader proposal, SCR130 is narrowly defined and limited in scope.
What makes 2025 plan different
SCR130 limits casino expansion to two sites, addressing concerns about wider proliferation. It also specifies how revenue would be used, including property tax relief, pensions, and support for Atlantic City’s tourism industry. Supporters believe this narrower approach could make the measure more acceptable to voters.
Governor Phil Murphy has indicated he is open to reconsidering casino expansion. As reported by local media outlets, he said that while Atlantic City remains important, New Jersey must acknowledge the changing competitive environment. His comments mark a shift from the silence that followed the 2016 referendum defeat.
Timeline and legislative hurdles
Atlantic City leaders remain cautious. They worry that new casinos in northern New Jersey could reduce existing revenue and slow the city’s recovery. This past summer was Atlantic City’s strongest in years, and many stakeholders prefer to build on that progress rather than face new competition. Critics also argue that expanding casinos could divide gaming revenue too widely, resulting in lower returns across the state.
SCR130 faces some challenges. It must pass both houses of the legislature with a three‑fifths majority by August 2026 to appear on the November ballot. Achieving this in a divided legislature will be difficult. If it succeeds, the measure will lead to one of the most important gambling votes in New Jersey’s recent history.
Subscribe HERE to SiGMA’s Top 10 News countdown and SiGMA’s weekly newsletter to stay up to date with all the latest iGaming News from the world’s iGaming authority, and benefit from subscriber-only offers.
