Web3 gamers prioritise fairness over volatility, survey finds
Public debate around Web3 gaming often centres on token volatility and speculation, but new survey data suggests players are focused elsewhere.
According to research conducted by 51 Games studio, nearly 30 percent of Web3 gamers identify Pay-to-Win mechanics as their primary concern. By contrast, only around 19 to 20 percent cite token inflation or economic instability as their biggest fear.
The data was collected and analysed by the 51 Games team from more than 12,000 Web3 gamers. The findings indicate that players are more concerned about fairness inside games than external market swings.
More than half of respondents, or around 52 percent, believe that effort should directly lead to reward. While players accept competition and performance gaps, the survey finds that they reject systems where spending money overrides skill or time investment.
When asked how they react to others earning more, 40 percent said they feel motivated to catch up. A further 27 percent said they want to understand the strategy behind that success. Only a small minority described feelings of frustration or unfairness.
Developers urged to rethink economic design
The survey findings point to game design as a central trust factor. Market conditions are largely outside a player’s control. Game mechanics are not.
The survey finds that when developers introduce wallet-based advantages, players view this as a structural decision that undermines merit-based systems. While inflation and unstable economies remain concerns for roughly one in five respondents, fairness ranks higher.
“Web3 gamers are not chasing quick profits. They evaluate systems. When players say they fear Pay-to-Win more than market volatility, they signal something important. They want rules that reward effort, not spending power. For developers, this shifts the focus from token price management to economic design and long-term trust,” Matvii Diadkov, Founder of 51 Games, said.
The survey results highlighted three implications for the sector. First, fairness acts as a retention driver. Games that design skill-based progression systems and maintain clear economic rules are more likely to sustain long-term engagement.
Second, the survey found that aggressive monetisation strategies may attract short-term users. However, this weakens trust over time. Players assess reward structures and compare value before committing time and capital.
Third, the data challenges the assumption that Web3 gamers primarily chase speculative gains. While earning remains part of the appeal, it found thatplayers frame value in terms of effort, progression and control.
Industry reset provides broader context
In December 2025, the Blockchain Game Alliance (BGA) released its 2025 State of the Industry Report, describing a sector moving away from “token-first” models towards playable games and sustainable revenue.
The report noted that annual investment into blockchain gaming fell to an estimated $293 million in 2025, down from $4 billion in 2021 and a peak of $10 billion in 2022. It characterised the contraction as a correction phase, with underfunded projects exiting the market while more structured teams remain.
Despite reduced capital inflows, seven out of ten respondents in the BGA’s survey said they were optimistic about the industry’s trajectory over the next 12 months. The outlook was described as more grounded, with expectations tied to delivery rather than hype. Against this backdrop, the 51 Games survey reinforces a consistent theme: players are looking for systems they perceive as fair and transparent.
Stay ahead of iGaming’s biggest stories with SiGMA’s Top 10 News countdown. The world’s biggest iGaming community brings you weekly insights and subscriber-only offers. Join HERE today.
