Minnesota advances prediction market ban bill to Senate floor
A bill to outlaw the majority of prediction market betting has been approved by a Senate committee in Minnesota without any opposition, and it will now go to a full Senate vote. It will proceed to the House for additional consideration if it is approved. The plan is regarded as one of the most forceful state-level initiatives to outlaw contracts dependent on sporting and political outcomes. Lawmakers argue the platforms operate as unregulated gambling services.
Bill sponsor John Marty said the legislation is aimed at closing regulatory gaps, alleging that companies market these products as investments while promoting them for wagering on real-world events. Platforms such as Kalshi and Polymarket have seen rapid growth, increasing scrutiny from regulators.
Marty said, “We’re saying that those are pure and simple bets. Regardless of what they do, they call them ‘bets’ when they’re marketing to people, and then, when you talk to them, they say, ‘Oh no, this is not betting at all, this is an investment product. What we’d be doing is making it clear. I would argue this is clarifying our state laws.”
Key details of bill
The Minnesota bill prohibits specific kinds of wagers in a wide manner. Wagers on elections, political results, sporting events, court cases, weather forecasts, and cultural or entertainment events basically, any real-world event with an uncertain outcome, would be outlawed. Regardless of how platforms offer them, lawmakers contend that these are simple bets.
However, the measure exempts charitable raffles, state-run lotteries, and casual social betting, such as friendly wagers during games like March Madness. This demonstrates that the goal is to restrict platforms deemed to be unregulated or possibly predatory rather than to outlaw gaming.
Controversy that sparked the bill
The drive for stricter regulations in Minnesota was sparked by an event involving state senator and congressional candidate Matt Klein. He bet $50 on his own primary race using the Kalshi platform, raising concerns about ethics, insider information, and manipulation. In the end, Klein admitted that his curiosity was the cause of Kalshi’s suspension and punishment.
The public, lawmakers, and authorities all immediately questioned how such betting was ever feasible. Klein admitted the issue and stated that the event demonstrated the need for more precise regulations. His behaviour became a case study for why Minnesota lawmakers think prediction markets need more regulation, which gave the current measure fresh impetus.
Reasons behind proposed ban
Legislators in Minnesota are pushing for a ban on various types of gambling due to concerns about consumer protection. Because prediction markets lack the security precautions used in casinos or sportsbooks, participants are often vulnerable to risks including addiction, fraud, or unfair tactics. This lack of oversight has become more alarming as these sites have grown in popularity.
Prediction markets have grown rapidly, moving from about $9 billion to over $60 billion in just a year. This surge has drawn attention from both tech companies and regulators worldwide, with some countries banning platforms like Polymarket while others are still deciding how to handle them.
Federal vs state power struggle
A power tussle between federal and state authorities is highlighted by the Minnesota measure. Treating prediction markets as derivatives platforms, the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) asserts exclusive jurisdiction over them. This position makes it more difficult for the state to control or outlaw them. The clash has already led to lawsuits, including a case where federal regulators challenged New York’s crackdown on prediction markets. Earlier this month, the federal government filed lawsuits against Connecticut, Arizona, and Illinois, challenging their efforts to restrict betting on prediction markets.
Minnesota House Republican Floor Leader Harry Niska stated, “I’m concerned about the sort of legal status of that. How do we do that with federal commodities laws, which apparently the CFTC [US Commodity Futures Trading Commission] thinks that they have exclusive jurisdiction over prediction markets.”
What happens next?
The bill will now go to a full Senate vote after passing a Senate committee. If it is approved, it will proceed to the House before possibly becoming law. For people in Minnesota, this would mean losing access to prediction market platforms; for businesses, it might lead to legal disputes and change the way the sector functions.
Stay ahead of iGaming’s biggest stories with SiGMA’s Top 10 News countdown. The world’s biggest iGaming community brings you weekly insights and subscriber-only offers. Join HERE today.
